The Greatest Show On Earth
tlogo2.gifMEDIA ADVISORY, Sept. 22 /Christian Newswire/ -- The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution is the title of atheist Richard Dawkin's latest book, and it's due to be released in the United States September 22. Coincidentally, that is the same release-day of best- selling author Ray Comfort's new book, Nothing Created Everything: the scientific impossibility of atheistic evolution (World Net Daily).

Comfort said, "I am amazed that the two publications came out on the same day. We sure didn't plan it that way, but I must say that Professor Dawkins has appropriately named his book this time. Evolution is the supreme circus. There's nothing else like it on earth. Richard Dawkins is the main act, and he is able to do his incredible high-wire act without the safety-net of science. It really is amazing to watch from the sidelines of common sense and basic reason. All evolution has, is bumps on whale bones and bacterial mutations, and yet he dazzles the awestruck crowd. There is no evidence for species to species transitional forms in the fossil record or in creation. That's what was missing in Darwin's day, and it's still missing today, something that doesn't seem to bother the professor in the slightest. He sure has nerves of steel."

Comfort said that his new book exposes the embarrassment of what is widely believed among evolutionists--that nothing created everything. "When they are confronted with that, they almost always backslide into agnosticism" the author and television co-host added. "This is because nothing cannot create anything. It is a scientific impossibility. To believe that is an embarrassment. Yet it's what the learned professor believes. Dawkins said, 'The fact that life evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved literally out of nothing-- is a fact so staggering that I would be mad to attempt words to do it justice.' (The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution)."

Comfort said that he doesn't dislike the professor. "I not only offered him $20,000 to debate me (which he turned down), but I used his special condemnation of me on the cover of Nothing Created Everything, and even dedicated the book to him." This November, Ray Comfort plans to give away 100,000 copies of Charles Darwin's Origin of Species (with a special Introduction) at 100 of the country's leading universities. This is to mark the 150th celebration of publication of the book. Details at www.livingwaters.com


Comments (29)
  • Pastor Flynn  - something that has been bothering me
    I came across the news of the distribution of Darwins Origin of Species with Ray
    Comfort's 50 page introduction. I think this is a worthy cause, but I got a
    sick feeling in my stomach when I read some of Ray's points.

    Were they incorrect points? Well that's not really the question here. Do Ray's
    points give strong evidence that he didn't read Origin of Species?? I can't
    say, but maybe he skimmed over it too quickly?

    I'm about as biased as you can get when it comes to wanting to support Ray's
    cause, and the intro itself doesn't clearly show that Ray didn't read the Origin
    of Species, but after seeing some interviews on the Living Waters site, it's
    very clear that he didn't read it. In the intro he touches on fish evolution,
    and the formation of lungs. Did he not read page 151 and 152 of the same PDF
    that has his introduction? On the 700 club interview he proposed the question
    as if an individual fish would wa...
  • Nicole
    First of all, Atheism is NOT a faith. Secondly, I have noticed Mr. Dawkins book
    on many of Bestsellers lists for weeks now, and today is the first I'm hearing
    of anyone named Ray Comfort. You want to know how I became an Atheist? I grew up
    going to church. I went to sunday school, sang in the choir. Then I got old
    enought to think for myself. And I realized, what a load of crap I had been
    listening to my whole life. And it had nothing to do with a science teacher in
    high school, or a professor in University. It was because I took the time to
    look at the facts, study the evidence and think for myself. Anywho who is buying
    into the things they read on this site, or any other christian site, is ignorant
    and unable to have an intellegent, individual though. Please do yourselves a
    favor and view this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvZz_pxZ2lw

    It is a debate with 2 Atheist and 2 members of the Catholic church. If you still
  • Glen  - Qualifications
    Your testimony has been given as if you have aquired some authoratative
    qualifications. When I look at it I see your trtue qualifications are
    Self-derived. In other words, you have made yourself God. This is known as
    original sin. Not some unique or intelligently arrived at. It is actually a
    lie you have been told and you have bought it hook, line and sinker. As a
    result you have been enslaved by its power. To resort to name calling is
    abundantly, overwhelmingly bad. It does not further your intelligence nor the
    intelligent arguement you thought you were making. What I want to know is what
    happened to you that made you enter into unbelief?
  • Tyler  - The ignorance..
    of Christians astound me. a man such as Andy can say a single word you people
    don't agree with and you'll get all up in arms

    on inhalejesus.blogspot.com i took a test that told me im going to hell and i am
    fine with it because id rather be surrounded by fire, brimstone, and sin then by
    ignorant fools
  • Glen  - Ignorant fools?
    Tyler, you'd rather be burned unquencably, soured sulfer smelled to the point of
    vomiting unquencably, and be seared with hate unquencably than to listen to
    these putative ignorant fools try to save you from it? Who is the ingnorant
    fool here? How can I expect you to listen to me or the word of God when you
    don't even listen to youself?
  • hogorina  - Police state
    This site is policed from without! Mention

    specfic words and automatically thier computer

    shuts one down?
  • hogorina
    This is a very interesting site. It would be

    well worth anyone's time to read of biblical works and listen to the videos. A
    remark about

    the Idumeans was completely out of thin air, sorry! Please keep up the good
    work. Thanks.
  • caseonmycouch  - well
    Paul said: I became everything to everyone so I might perchance win some to the
    Lord Jesus. He was a very learned fellow of his day and vehemently debated the
    wiseckers of his time in an attempt to shed light to their foolishness which
    they regarded as knowledge. If Ray can do the same, I say Go RAY!
    But when all is said and done, the moment of truth is in the future when
    Darwinists and atheists will get to stand b4 Jesus and hear their very words
    condemn them to eternal damnation.
    This is not a "theory" or a scare tactic, it's the cold hard truth. You
    don't have to agree with it, but it will find you out at the appointed time.
    I now have my case resting on the couch, pls don't disturb it.
  • Hogorina
    Please explain the fact the ancient Idumeans,

    EDOMITES,as mentioned by MALAKI, through ESAU

    is hardly mentioned by christians to day?

    Hogorina
  • Perkins  - Evolution is a fact & theory (not the normal usage
    You've been told that "evolution is just a theory", a guess, a hunch,
    and not a fact, not proven. You've been misled. Keep reading, and in less than
    two minutes from now you'll know that you've been misinformed. We're not going
    to try and change your mind about evolution. We just want to point out that
    "it's just a theory" is not a valid argument.

    The Theory of Evolution is a theory, but guess what? When scientists use the
    word theory, it has a different meaning to normal everyday use.1 That's right,
    it all comes down to the multiple meanings of the word theory. If you said to a
    scientist that you didn't believe in evolution because it was "just a
    theory", they'd probably be a bit puzzled.

    In everyday use, theory means a guess or a hunch, something that maybe needs
    proof. In science, a theory is not a guess, not a hunch. It's a
    well-substantiated, well-supported, well-documented explanati...
  • Lori Rigby  - reply to perkins about evolution
    If what you say is true about the scientific community, I can't help but point
    out to you that this is A perfect example of how the worldy flesh is corrupted
    and altered by satans tacticts. What sly way to completely change the meaning of
    A word to fit your explanation. My prayer for you is that you except Christ as
    your Savior and start to read the only truth there really is, and that is the
    Holy Bible!!!!!!!!
  • andy1968  - Lori Rigby
    You say: What sly way to completely change the meaning of A word to fit your
    explanation.

    It's not sly, a scientific theory is supported by an abundance of facts. This
    has always been the case. In any case the evidential can't be slyly changed - go
    and look at the fossil evidence for yourself in the natural history museum and
    decide for yourself. 'Only a theory' is not an arguement for creationism. Saying
    'only a theory' does not argue against anything you need to show POSITIVE
    evidence of your own.



    Thanks Andy.
  • Neil  - I have been to the museums...
    and i have yet to see a transitional form... Even heard someone comment about
    that who is an old-earther, why is there not 1 transitional form in the Chicago
    museum of natural history? (other then the debunked lucy), in fact having the
    discredited Lucy, and not mentioning the truth behind it proves how bad their
    case is.
  • andy1968  - evolution
    Lucy has not been not discredited. Every fossil is a transitional form. We are
    transitional forms between our parents and our children. I think you have
    misunderstood how evolution works. One animal does not change into another over
    one generation, it happens over time. When one species splits 2 ways, by
    geographical methods say, 2 new species will evolve. The original species will
    be the common ancestor and you will have 2 new species separated by their
    position. You may not find the common ancestor in the fossil record but does not
    mean the didn't exist.



    Thanks Andy.
  • Glen  - Ha, HA, Ha, Ha.
    Andy is another poster that really makes me laugh. Maybe those zits are the
    vesitgal buds forming a new limb or face part. Nonsense coming from a master at
    his art, falsehood.

    We are all transitional froms. Man alive Andy, I think I am gonna start
    writting your stuff down and go on the road as a stand-up comic. Wow this stuff
    is good.
  • andy1968  - comedy show
    Glen, if you are using my stuff for your comedy show you need to send me 10% of
    the earnings. That can be your tithing.



    Thanks Andy.
  • Glen  - Tithing
    tithing goes to God not man. You are not God. But funny nevertheless.

    I think it is very exciting to see how much knowledge about God you have. You
    even know about tithing. Now you have been convicted of having no excuse when
    your time comes. There is a vast difference between knowledge about God and
    Knowing God personnally. The dif-ference is a gulf that you cannot cross,
    unless you know God; unless you have accepted the cross. Andy I wish I could
    unblind your eyes but that is an issue between you and God. All you have to do
    is accept his payment of your sin debt.
  • Markus  - Greatest show on earth
    I wonder which book is outselling the other.
  • Charles Stephens  - Guess
    I bet a thousand dollers that Dawkins book is out selling Ray's, probably due to
    the fact that Creation is alread scientificly discredited in almost everything
    it does. So that is just a wild guess, but then again...
  • Glen  - I get a good laugh sometimes
    Charles Stephens comments really make me laugh out loud sometimes. I mean
    really laugh. Ray is giving "his" book away not selling it and Dawkins
    is selling "his" book. Charlie boy I am not gonna take you up on that
    bet. It is a sucker bet. And not because science has any-thing at all to do
    with it. Science cannot discredit the very thing it studies. It is profoundly
    dumb to make such a statement. Again, science cannot discredit the very thing
    is works hard to describe; namely creation. Sorry fella. Try that line on
    another mark. This one ain't buyin'.
  • Glen  - Reading thier stuff
    What is interesting in Brent's statement is that the christian must read the
    non-christian stuff in order to creat or formulate an agreeable arguement to
    disuade the non-bliever.



    Nonsense! It is not biblical. The Holy Spirit lead Jesus to answer the
    Pharisee's trying to trap him and will lead us in the same way. Interestingly
    Jesus usually answered in a way that foiled the question by attacking the
    underlying lie.



    There are those Christians though that have been brought out of this line of
    thinking. They ave already consumed this poison and have been cleansed of teh
    lies by turning to Jesus. Jesus them uses thier intimate understandings to lead
    the way in the battle. Not because they know somethng Jesus doesn't. It is
    because they can now testify along with the Holy Spirit to who Jesus is and the
    work Jesus has done.



    It is the testimony that is important.



    All Paul did was to p...
  • Merryl  - Reading
    Brent, I'm just passing through the site and saw your comment. I do read some
    science texts-not very many, though, because I prefer novels. I did like Bill
    Bryson's Short History of Nearly Everything.



    The reason I don't read Dawkins, though, is that he takes an antagonistic view
    of my culture in his books. While I respect his choices, I don't see the need to
    read a book by a man who thinks that religion is 'society's greatest evil'.
    However, I will admit that he seems like a decent guy in his interviews.
  • Brent  - Selective reading
    It's too bad more Christians don't read the books put out by Dawkins, Eldridge,
    etc. which espouse a point of view contrary to their own positions. Only by
    doing so can we understand what they believe, where they stand, and be able to
    put together coherent arguments to counter them. It is also the only way to
    find the logical or other faults in their arguments. You might be surprised to
    find that many of the evolutionist authors admit they have to take evolution on
    faith because they have no evidence to support it as anything but a theory, and
    that they continue with it because they don't want to believe in a god, let
    alone the God.
  • Texas Truth Teller  - UN-Biblical arguement!
    Brent, I must vehemently disagree with you. Quite the opposite is true. The
    Bible NEVER admonishes Christians to "study the works of darkness",
    which is what "books put out by Dawkins, Eldridge, etc." clearly are.
    Rather, we are told, "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman
    that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." (2
    Timothy 2:15) Furthermore, we are to "have no fellowship with the unfruitful
    works of darkness, but rather, reprove them", where to "reprove" is
    to "make manifest" with "light" (Ephesians 5:11-13) That
    "light" is GOD'S WORD, specifically, God's law! (Psalm 119:105; Proverbs
    6:23) Those who are trained in "spotting a counterfeit" don't do so by
    studying the counterfeit,

    but the genuine. If Christians would spend more time prayerfully studying the
    Bible, having a true heart for the lost as their Lord J...
  • dawkwin  - don't get mad...just think
    I would think that Prof Dawkins would be willing to either debate you for free
    due to the fact that he is THE evolutionary-Atheist of our modern time.



    How could he not stand up for his faith?



    I am happy to say that he will probably go down in history as the man who
    attempted to prove that the emperor did indeed have a clothing-like substance
    that covered his nakedness.



    I think his followers will end up waking up very very soon.
  • Richard  - Debate
    "How could he not stand up for his faith?"

    I've read before that Dawkins will not take part in debates with people such as
    Ray as he is of the opinion that by granting a debate will legitimise their
    opinions. Dawkins has said he has no interest in arguing with somebody who is
    "utterly ignorant" on a topic and that it would only serve to advance
    the case put forward by Ray.

    I was not a fan of Dawkins, but I have been watching some of his debates on
    youtube and despite his very hostile nature, he is a very intelligent well
    spoken man and his arguments do seem compelling.

    Regarding evolution, logically some elements seemed fantastical to me
    originally. However, I have been listening to a podcast called the Skeptics
    Guide to The Universe - the presenter Steven Novella does explain away some of
    the confusion in a very clear easy to understand way. I love that this subject
    has become so popu...
  • Andy1968  - TGSOE
    Just read TGSOE and is an excellent read. Richard a good film to watch on
    youtube is:

    Carl Sagan 'we are star stuff'. This outlines evolution in a diagramatic way
    that is easy to understand. Don't know why Brent encourages Christians to read
    more Dawkins and Eldridge and then misunderstands the word 'theory' which
    Dawkins explains at length in his book - that is the difference between an
    ordinary idea and a proper scientific theory. Evolution is a proper scientific
    theory supported by many facts.
  • Glen  - Liar!
    Andy yoou are wrong! And you are a liar.
  • Witchdoctor24  - Why did Richard not take the debate?
    Richard Dawkins has already gone through alot of debates, and in many, videos
    were edited to make it seem like he did not know the anwser to a question. The
    reason Dawkins did not go into that debate is because he had already debunked
    creationism and does not want another edited video out there because many people
    won't check to get thier facts straight.
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.